VERY SERIOUS WARNING...OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.

Site Administrator posted on March 19, 2011 20:47

VERY SERIOUS WARNING...OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.

164diggsdigg

Just got this...pass it far & wide.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States

On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.

Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.

As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here

http://www.reuters.com/article/ politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

14 Nov. 2009 < http://www.reuters.com/article/ politicsNews/ idUSTRE59E0Q9200 91015

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed. This is a very serious matter! Silence will lead us to Socialism!!!

Posted in: 2nd Amendment Articles, Featured Articles

Actions: Send To A Friend | Bookmark | Comments (10)

Comments

# Lone Eagle

Friday, April 01, 2011 11:28 AM

The Constitution of the United States has a protection against this and this article doesn't clarify that.

Article II, Section 2, Second Paragraph, First Sentence: "He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;"

The President of the United States MUST first seek the advise of the United State Senate and must gain their consent to enter into any treaty with any foreign nation. Upon the signing of a treaty the United States Senate MUST ratify that treaty by a two-thirds vote of its Senators (60 out of 100, I believe is the magic number).

Why did the Founding Fathers set-up making and ratifying treaties this way? To understand that we look at Article VI, Paragraph 2, First Sentence:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;"

This sentence states that the Constitution, Laws, and Treaties shall be the supreme Law of the Land. Treaties with foreign nations have the same impact on the American people as the Constitution does. The President cannot just make a treaty because he wants to, that isn't his power UNTIL he is given CONSENT to do so by the United States Senate.

The United States Senate originally was to represent the States and as the Federal Government can tell the States what to do, how to spend their money (Medicare and Medicaid a prime example) the States were to have a say as well. That was what the US Senate was to be. The 17th Amendment, however, destroyed state sovereignty and now there is no longer that check and balance.

Right now the Senate sits to 53 to 47 with the Democratic Caucus in control of the Upper House of the United States Legislature. They would have to bring 7 Republicans over to ratify the treaty AND make sure none of their Blue Dog Democrats don't vote against it.

This type of tactic has been talked about for years now and it hasn't gone anywhere. I seriously doubt it will ever have enough support here at home, and the Senate for that matter, to ever really gain any steam. The Obama Administration can talk about it all they want, go to the United Nations and talk, but without fulfilling that part in Article II, Section 2 there isn't any force behind the talks.

Visit Charles A. Hall, The Lone Eagle @ http://www.charlesahall.us.

# Site Administrator

Friday, April 01, 2011 1:13 PM

Thank you for the information on Article VI, Paragraph 2. I pray that this holds true with this administration. Thank you for your post here at C4F.

# countryboy1949

Friday, April 08, 2011 11:12 AM

I have news for Mr Obama...Treaties DON'T supersede the Constitution...Treaties still have to be Constitutional and signing the treaty wont void the 2nd amendmet because it's unconstitutional to do so without amending the Constitution.

http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/treaty-making-powers-of-the-united-states/

# Frugalfart

Sunday, April 10, 2011 8:46 PM

You paranoid conservatives crack me up. LOL
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp

# Site Administrator

Sunday, April 10, 2011 9:02 PM

U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/10/15/us-arms-usa-treaty-idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

# Frugalfart

Sunday, April 10, 2011 9:24 PM

The Reuters article has nothing to do with restricting
the sale or ownership of guns within the United States. The aim of a potential
U.N. arms treaty is to combat the illicit international trade of small arms by
"tightening regulation of, and setting international standards for, the import,
export and transfer of conventional weapons" in order to "close gaps in existing
regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass
onto the illicit market." Even if such a treaty came to pass, U.S. rights and laws
regarding the sale and ownership of small arms would still apply within the United
States.

# Shiner

Wednesday, April 27, 2011 9:58 AM

A co-worker forwarded this article to me. I find it funny how this sort of article fuels the fears of people like him. Certain people/groups in our government have been trying to attack our right to bare arms for years. This is nothing new. This is also not the first time I have heard about this particular issue either. Let me ask this... How would they enforce such legislation? With the lack of support for this on the state level and the shear number of unregistered guns out there... How would they really do this? Other points to consider: Think about all the people you know that own some sort of gun. How many own more than one. How many are actually registered? How many have been passed down from generation to generation. Talk to some of these people and get their opinion on whether or not they would actually turn their guns in. The largest "army" in the world period is the "American Gun Owner." Even bigger than our own armed forces.

# Site Administrator

Wednesday, April 27, 2011 10:36 AM

The largest "army" in the world period is the "American Gun Owner." "Even bigger than our own armed force.

Amen!

VERY SERIOUS WARNING...OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT.

Comments

Post Comment